Bob's ART du Jour

Hi, I'm Bob Eggleton and this is my painting and "life in general blog" but mostly paintings. Usually they're for sale. Anyway, if you like something contact me at and ENJOY!!

My Photo
Location: New England, United States

I am a Hugo award-winning fantasy/SF artist who works on both publishing projects and film concept work(such as Jimmy Neutron and most recently, The Ant Bully) but I have a passion for landscape work, small paintings and exploring the properties of paint. This blog will mostly showcase my "painting-for-the-day" as kind of a personal voyage. I'll also be inserting sketches,photos and ideas of projects I am working on, that I can, when I can, so look for those every so often(usually as paint is drying!)

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Of Hugos and Chesleys of the past.....

Me in 1998 with my Hugo. 

Coming up on 20 years ago, as odd as that seems I won my first of nine Hugo Awards.I won 8 times for Best Professional Artist and once for Best Related Book.I can honestly say I have been moved by winning them over the years, but all artists and writers have their shelf-life with these kinds of things.  So I had a string of wins, I'm very proud of that.  And with winning them comes the inevitable abuse and backlash.  Because this is America and success is often rewarded by attacks from the jealous and hateful, with nasty comments. 

The Hugo Award is a FAN award for excellence in science fiction and fantasy.  It was created in the early 1950s and named for Hugo Gernsback, awarded at The World Science Fiction Convention(created in 1939) and the first one went to Forrest J Ackerman who would later create Famous Monsters Magazine.  Over the years it has deservedly gone to some outstanding professionals and fans, In my own Pro Artist category, it went to Kelly Freas, Rick Sternbach, Jim Burns and of course, Michael Whelan all multiple times for their outstanding art to name a few. In those days, fans saw the the covers to magazines and books and voted "snail mail" ballots.  Many of my early wins were from this way, until the millenium when the internet took over, I still won, in fact I was the dominant winner from 1994-2004, a good ten year run I won't complain about. And, I was nominated straight from 1988 to 2012. Not bad for half a lifetime of love of a field and realizing that it's okay to be a fan AND a pro of what you practice.

The Best Related Book is somewhat bittersweet as the win was "challenged" by a close loser in the same category.  He threatened legal action against me and demanded a recount.  This was in 2001.  This heralded a darker time for this award, when it became highly political.  Around 2004 or so, a "new element" began to play a factor in these awards.  It crept in from the sidelines, like a virus, from the concept of co-opting the award, not for the love of science fiction but for self-important attention-getting: and like a virus, changing the very cells it infected to make itself an entity.  The individuals involved in this "coterie" or star chamber of charlatans who decided from not just a writing point of view but an art point of view to manipulate and change the voting process to suit their own needs.  What was inappropriate, was that the individuals were professionals.  Professionals wanting to "massage" or gerrymander the voting process, of a *fan* award. Administered by fans, voted on by fans.  And co-opted by professionals who were the furthest thing from fans with the agenda of creating awards they could win and bask in the light of. 

It is one thing to have an agenda which it was. But another to start personal insults with that agenda.  One British critic named Adam Roberts, himself a younger man, and with no sense of history, decided that any artist having won the award, since 1966(he was born in 1965) was "unoriginal" and derivative.  He personally attacked me, in a blog, not even having known me.  Meanwhile the artist "coterie" attempted a coup of the Professional Artist Hugo by attempting to make it so that myself and other past winners could no longer qualify.  The sad part is not one of them had any knowledge of the history of the award. They only saw that they "lost" and not much else which is attention-whoring of the highest order.  Insults passed on blogs included referring to me "Just because he's a nice guy and has nice hair does not mean he deserves an award". And that comment came from a VERY surprising source, a person I considered a friend and supported his respected "art annual" book.  I realized where I stood with this.  I was even publicly "called upon" by another winner, to "bow out" of the award as I was seen as old hat, hurting me deeply in what should have been a good time.  This is someone I had only ever shown kindness to.  In fact one winner, I had even given him names and tips to get cover art work, in the 90s, which he did very successfully, only later to be kicked in the teeth by his backstabbing. I was simply put, bullied by those seeking the perceived financial reward of such attention from such an award.  And believe me, it's JUST perception.

As a fan, myself, I warn fellow fans...these people are like, the aliens in INDEPENDENCE DAY(1996) "They jump from world to world, like locusts, taking what they want, and leaving the world dead".  Watch them. I warn you, if you are a fan and reading this,  their manipulations are a *doomwatch* for the field. They are parasites.

Now, we have Hugos that are openly campaigned for.  On the net and social media and such, which was inevitable.  The recent series of mix-ups and misunderstandings and outright disasters on the part of the Loncon Hugo Awards-controversies created by "professionals" and their agendas, illustrates what has happened to what used to be a fun award ceremony. They complain about a chosen host of said awards, without knowing facts and proceed then to attack his family.  Later, when people are nominated(possibly as  backlash) "they" don't like and don't want on the ballot, they complain and whine about the choices MADE BY FANS.

 As to me....I've dropped off the ballot by attrition. Inevitable after 24 years(I was 52 when I fell off so that gives you some idea of time spent on said ballot. Apparently I made the record books for nominations for an artist in three categories).  And I am quite happy to have done so, and, quite happy for anyone who wins. My wins can never ever be taken from me. I am gladdened by the fact I am in the history books of Science Fiction for my contributions. I still love SF and Fantasy. It is my blood. My attentions are focused elsewhere and I do well with that. I won in years when it counted. Similar to Michael Whelan, Kelly Freas, Ed Emshwiller, Jim Burns and others...we won when the award was a pretty special thing, basically a THANK YOU from the fans.

The Chesleys. Here is an award sponsored by The Association of SF/Fantasy Artists. The Chesleys, which I have 12 of, from 1988 to 2004, have an air of quiet desperation about them. Knowing the personal anguish of a close friend who is involved in the "suggestions" and  "nominations", I can tell you, political doesn't even start to describe it.  This is another award that has been quietly co-opted by people who seek ANY award they can get. While I have done award worthy work, I have never won many past 2004.  In fact I would say the word "snubbed" simply because I am who I am, outspoken and blunt about these things.  I even retracted a piece from a nomination only because via sheer ignorance, no one realized it was a re-used piece from years ago and thus did not qualify.   Honestly, I did my thing, it is nice to be "outside" all that.  I do not endorse or support ASFA, but, I don't begrudge it either.  The Chesleys are simply good for those needing a boost, just starting their careers.  I look on from outside the glass menagerie.

So here we are at Award Season in SF and Fantasy.  I wish anyone nominated the very best.  But remember, winning is not everything and when you do win, you will be despised and hated by a vocal minority.  Watch them, beware of the collusion of industry professionals, who want to co-opt things for their own gains.  I am reminded of President Dwight Eisenhower's farewell speech warning of a "military industrial complex" and look where that led. Watch your backs my fellow winners. The knives are sharpening....enjoy your awards, let NO ONE take that from you.


Blogger Anne Gray said...

I am so sorry to hear of those nasty comments. I hope that this year and in future years we all celebrate nominees and winners alike, and encourage everyone to be successful. I am so excited to see Julie Dillon on the ballot because I love her work, and I hope that is why anyone makes it on there, and why people nominate and vote.

Coming into Worldcon/WSFS fandom around 2002, I was one of the people of the mind that many categories appeared to be dominated at the nomination stage by a sort of personal popularity contest rather than an awareness of that year's work. That was why I helped build the sfeditorwatch wiki and was working on an sfartistwatch wiki - before they both got killed by spam edits that were beyond my technical abilities and available time to keep up with. - I never meant to denigrate the previous winners of the awards, only to widen public awareness of the breadth of the field. I don't remember, but if I made any of the comments that hurt your feelings, I'm sorry.

The people I know who have suggested that former winners bow out have not meant for you (or anyone else) to be seen as "old hat", but only to encourage nominators to go out and actively consider the question of who might be doing outstanding work they might have seen but with whose name they might not already be familiar.

In that vein, I have been pleased to see the Hugo nomination forms change, to ask people to name works if they can from the nomination period - this encourages the process to be in response to the work, I believe. However, as you say, there are other activities that have politicized the awards. I am concerned about them too.

8:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home